Il clamore dell’acquisto da parte di Oracle Corporation di Sun e quindi dei suoi prodotti, ha fatto il giro della rete in poche ore.
Su questo stesso blog è stato trattato l’argomento, visionabile a questo indirizzo.
Subito, sono nati i primi commenti.
Tra questi, sicuramente uno dei più autorevoli è quello di Michael Widenius (detto “Monty”), ovvero il creatore del DBMS OpenSource MySql, nonchè membro fondatore della MYSQL AB, società che per anni ha seguito lo sviluppo del software.
Sul suo blog, potete leggere il suo sfogo (in lingua inglese ovviamente), di cui qui vi riporto la parte iniziale:
Tonight at 4:30 AM, USA Pacific time, my phone started to ring; it was a call from a Sun employee saying that Oracle has bought Sun and he wanted to join Monty Program Ab.
Shortly after that I got a call from a Swedish newspaper, Computer Sweden, who asked me about my opinion about why Oracle would buy Sun.
The reasons I see why Oracle is buying Sun are:
- Sun is making big hardware, that is easy to bundle with very big Oracle installations.
- Sun is making very good, reliable Intel boxes that work well for database usage.
- Sun’s virtualization product, VirtualBox
- Sun tape Storage, very well suited for efficiency database backups etc.
- Sun has done a lot of advanced work in cloud computing (even if Sun has not yet been able to monetize it)
- OpenSolaris, that would be a much better offer to Oracle’s customers than their Oracle Linux platform, which doesn’t provide any notable value over RedHat.
- Java
- And, of course, MySQL
What could be Oracle’s plan with MySQL? Three different plans come to mind:
- They are going to kill MySQL (either directly or by not developing/supporting it fully)
- MySQL will get sold of to another entity, either because Oracle doesn’t want it or becasue of anti-trust laws.
- They will embrace MySQL and Open Source and put their technical expertise on it to ensure that MySQL continues to be the most popular advanced Open Source database.
I am putting my hopes to the third option, but for succeeding in that Oracle has to also learn a lot about open source development and working with the community.
This brings up the question, once again, how can one own an Open Source Project. Patrick Galbraith, summed up his feelings in a recent blog post, , that the “ownership” of Free and open source projects has more to do with who provides the best stewardship of the code, rather than who owns a trademark.
I don’t think that anyone can own an open source project; the projects are defined by the de-facto project leaders and the developers that are working on the project. If the company loses the trust of these people, they can go away and fork the project and turn it the way they want to.
Sun’s acquisition of MySQL did not go smoothly; most of the MySQL leaders (both commercial and project) have left Sun and the people who are left are sitting with their CV and ready to press send.
…
Per leggere l’articolo completo, visitate il blog di Michael Widenius a questo indirizzo: http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/04/to-be-free-or-not-to-be-free.html.
Come potete leggere, il creatore di MySql fa un’analisi molto ampia di quello che potrebbe essere il destino della sua creatura.
Voi cosa ne pensate? Condividete quello che è stato scritto?
Spero vivamente nella terza ipotesi…
Ciao Federico,
la terza ipotesi è quella che tutti noi programmatori ci auguriamo fortemente.
Certamente, nel caso Oracle decidesse di continuare lo sviluppo di MySql, porterebbe sicuramente enormi vantaggi per tutti gli utilizzatori di questo fantastico DBMS!